Ethereum: How is slashing in ethereum actually implemented?

THE MECHANICS TO CURET IN ETHEREUM: Understanding the implementation

The Ethereum cutting mechanism is a critical component of its validation process, ensuring that validators behave as planned. In this article, we will deepen how the Court works in Ethereum and explore the voting aspect, highlighting the importance of consensus.

Cutting casics

When a validator does not validate transactions or performs an invalid transaction, it can activate a cutting event. The objective is to prevent malicious behavior, such as selfish mining (where validators prioritize their own interests on the welfare of the network). The validators that do not meet certain conditions are responsible for the loss of their funds.

The cutting process

Here is a breakdown step by step of the cutting process:

• Validation failure : A validator cannot validate transactions or perform an invalid transaction.

• Cutting event : The node that activates the event is identified and the cutting condition is verified. This implies verifying that the transaction contains a valid Nance (unique code) and meets other criteria established by the Ethereum Network (for example, which requires at least three confirmations).

• Validation of validators

  

  : The validators that activated the event are reverifiable through their signature in the block they claimed to have validated.

• Consensus : If multiple validators claim to have validated transactions, a consensus is reached through a process called “delegate test” (DPOS) or “weighted random selection”. This implies the use of the reputation of the validator, the stake level and the voting power to determine in which validator should be trusted in future validation tasks.

• Slashing : The validator that does not meet the cutting condition is penalized by confiscating their funds.

Voting mechanism

The other validators in a network do not vote directly on whether a specific validator loses a cut or loses its funds. Instead, they delegate their vote power to their elected representatives (for example, through the DPO system). This delegation ensures that the validators with more bets and reputation are more likely to participate in the validation process.

selfish mining

While the Court is intended to prevent malicious behavior, sometimes it can lead to selfish mining (that is, the validators that prioritize its own interests on the welfare of the network). This occurs when a validator does not meet the cutting condition, but still collects its funds. Selfish miners often exploit vulnerabilities in the system, such as exploiting block size or transaction complexity.

Mitigating selfish mining

To address selfish mining, Ethereum has implemented several measures:

* Gas ​​limits : Validators are limited by their gas budget, which prevents them from trying to extract complete blocks with low -risk validators.

* Weighted random selection (WRP) : The DPO USA WRP system to select validators for future validation duties based on its stake and reputation level. This helps reduce the probability of selfish mining.

Conclusion

The cutting mechanism in Ethereum is a complex process that requires careful implementation to prevent malicious behavior while guaranteeing the stability of the network. While voting mechanisms, such as DPO, help mitigate their own interest, it is essential to address the root causes of selfish mining through measures such as gas limits and weighted random selection. By understanding how cutting in Ethereum works, we can better appreciate the complexities of this critical component of the blockchain ecosystem.